The US Lumber Coalition and American Loggers Council pan Canadian subsidies, call on Trump to increase tariff measures. In related news: Prime Minister Carney’s budget includes carbon targets; Maine’s Woodland Pulp curtails operations, stops using New Brunswick softwoods; West Fraser workers are heartbroken over BC mill closure; Hampton Lumber breaks ground on its South Carolina mill; and EU and UK timber industry groups unite over illegal imports from Russia.
In Forestry/Climate news: a leaked report claims BC’s timber harvest is overstated; BC forestry protests urge reduced AACs, forestry reforms; Brazil pushes for climate progress at COP30; CO280 completes carbon capture pilot as US pulp mill; California researchers say prescribed burning helps store forest carbon; and Virginia Tech to advance remote sensing technologies.
Finally, the Softwood Lumber Board expands its mass timber Accelerator Cities Program.
Kelly McCloskey, Tree Frog News Editor
OTTAWA — Prime Minister Mark Carney on Tuesday defended making a commitment to carbon emission targets to get the government’s spending plan over the finish line. Carney told reporters before the weekly cabinet meeting in Ottawa that he was “very pleased” his government narrowly won the crucial budget vote on Monday night. …”I can confirm to this House that we will respect our Paris commitments for climate change, and we are determined to achieve them,” Carney said. He also said a nature strategy will be released soon, keeping Canada on target for its commitments on biodiversity as well. That was enough to sway May to vote with the Liberals, a vote that earned her grateful applause from the Liberal caucus. …”Canada is blessed with immense natural resources, everything from hydroelectricity through to conventional oil and gas. We’re part of an energy transition, we’re going to help to lead it.”
West Fraser-100 Mile Lumber employees like Kris Taylor are taking each day as it comes, following the announcement of the 
EU and UK timber industry organisations have declared their “unwavering commitment” against imports of Russian and Belarusian wood products. In an announcement published on the TDUK website, CEI-Bois (European Confederation of Woodworking Industries), ETTF (European Timber Trade Federation), EOS (European Organisation of the Sawmill Industry), and TDUK (Timber Development UK) – have signed the united statement reaffirming the EU and UK woodworking industry’s and wood traders’ strong and unwavering commitment to complying with applicable legislation governing the import of wood products from Russia or Belarus. …Sanctions on wood from Russia and Belarus were introduced years ago, yet residual quantities of prohibited wood regrettably remain in circulation in Europe. …“Our message is clear: the EU and UK wood industry value chain is united in its determination not to import Russian and Belarusian wood. Integrity is a core value of our industry, and we reject illegal and unethical practices by any company.”
A leaked technical review prepared for a group of First Nations claims British Columbia is greatly overestimating how much timber it can sustainably harvest in a push for short-term economic gains. The previously unreleased report charges that the methods the province uses to calculate how many trees are on the landscape—and therefore how much can be logged—is fundamentally flawed and based on “wildly extreme assumptions” that hurt the long-term health of B.C.’s forests. The report’s authors … only agreed to speak with BIV after it independently obtained a 572-page draft of the report originally dated September 2024. “There’s a strong likelihood that throughout the province we’re cutting almost at twice the rate of what is considered sustainable,” said co-author Dave Radies. The report focuses on the Mackenzie timber supply area… The analysis challenges the methods B.C. uses to determine the annual allowable cut …concluding their numbers are likely double what can be harvested without causing significant long-term damage.
At face value, the amount of forest in Australia is officially increasing, and has been since 2008. But if an old-growth tree is felled in a forest and seedlings grow elsewhere, is the official account ecologically sound? Not according to new analysis, which suggests that the way Australia calculates forest cover obfuscates the impacts of ongoing deforestation. Australia calculates forest cover as a net figure, in which forest losses are “netted off” against forest gains. That is problematic, according to a report led by Griffith University’s Climate Action Beacon, because new forests do not store as much carbon or have the same wildlife benefits as established forests that are being destroyed. Prof Brendan Mackey of Griffith University, one of the study’s co-authors, described measuring forest losses and gains in net terms as “an accounting sleight of hand”.
